SAP C_S4TM Prüfungsthemen:
| Abschnitt | Ziele |
|---|---|
| Verwaltung von Frachtaufträgen | - Erstellung und Lebenszyklus von Frachtaufträgen
|
| Planung und Optimierung | - Erstellung und Planung von Frachteinheiten
|
| Durchführung und Verfolgung | - Prozesse der Transportdurchführung
|
| Stammdaten und Organisationsstruktur | - Organisationseinheiten im TM
|
| Integration und Fiori-Anwendungen | - SAP Fiori-Apps für TM
|
| Überblick über das Transportation Management | - Grundlegende Konzepte von SAP TM in S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition
|
| Gebührenverwaltung und Abrechnung | - Frachtkostenermittlung und Berechnung von Gebühren
|
SAP Certified - SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition, Transportation Management (C_S4TM_2601) C_S4TM Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen
1. CHALLENGE 4 - Charge Calculation and Settlement Grouping Alignment
Finance reports that freight settlement documents are created, but the cost distribution does not consistently match the delivery-item grouping used by planners when freight orders were executed. Dispatchers suggest fixing the invoices manually after go-live.
Which response best supports rollout readiness?
Response:
A) Accept manual invoice correction for the first close because transportation execution is already working.
B) Create separate settlement documents by plant even when freight orders group deliveries operationally across plants.
C) Stop freight order execution testing and focus only on carrier agreement rate maintenance until all charges calculate.
D) Validate the alignment between freight order structure, charge calculation, settlement relevance, and delivery-item cost distribution.
2. CHALLENGE 3 - Carrier Output Timing for Loading Cutoff Readiness
Carrier output is sent quickly after a manual freight order change, but the communication does not reflect the final bonded warehouse pickup window. Warehouse teams have already prepared the loading area based on the earlier dispatch expectation.
What should the consultant recommend?
Response:
A) Require finance to approve warehouse surcharges before carrier output is sent.
B) Validate that carrier output is issued from execution-ready freight orders that reflect final pickup timing before loading preparation.
C) Continue sending early output because carrier confirmation speed is the main first-close success factor.
D) Remove pickup-window details from carrier communication so the warehouse can manage timing independently.
3. A regional field robotics distributor is defining SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management scope for planned spare-module replenishment and customer-requested robot retrieval shipments. The first release must support freight order planning, execution visibility, and later settlement for planned replenishment. Retrieval shipments still depend on customer release approval, unclear packaging responsibility, and variable carrier acceptance that have not been validated in the target process.
The support manager wants retrieval shipments included immediately because they affect repair-cycle reporting. The transportation consultant warns that unclear preparation ownership could create planning exceptions and settlement disputes. The constraint is to deliver a stable first release while keeping retrieval shipments available for a later controlled transition.
Which blueprinting decision best supports the rollout constraint?
Response:
A) Include customer-requested retrieval shipments immediately so repair-cycle reporting captures all visible transportation demand.
B) Activate planned spare-module replenishment first and define retrieval shipments as later-wave scope after release approval, packaging ownership, and carrier acceptance are validated.
C) Configure freight settlement for retrieval shipments first so posting results determine whether the flow is operationally ready.
D) Delay planned replenishment activation until retrieval shipments can use the same transportation and settlement model.
4. A regional architectural lighting distributor is testing SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management for outbound shipments that include boxed fixtures and curved display frames. Freight units are created from delivery requirements, and the intended carrier lane is valid. During validation, freight orders combine curved frames and boxed fixtures into a pickup sequence that conflicts with the warehouse's frame-protection loading rule.
The warehouse team confirms that curved frames carry special handling indicators in the source requirement, but freight order formation still treats them like standard boxed goods. The constraint is to preserve the validated route and carrier assignment while preventing freight orders that cannot be loaded safely.
What is the best corrective action?
Response:
A) Correct freight unit and packaging control so special handling indicators influence freight order formation before pickup.
B) Increase carrier capacity assumptions so combined freight orders remain executable during pickup.
C) Create a separate regional route for curved display frames so route determination separates them from boxed fixtures.
D) Ask planners to manually split curved-frame shipments before each carrier pickup.
5. A specialty chemicals company is preparing freight settlement in SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management for lanes served by contracted carriers. Freight orders are executable, and carrier charges are calculated. During finance testing, accessorial charges for hazardous handling appear at freight order level, but they are not reflected in the expected delivery-level cost allocation used for margin review.
Finance wants accurate delivery-level reporting before settlement postings are released for the affected lane. Logistics wants to continue testing unaffected lanes because carrier invoice deadlines are approaching. The constraint is to protect reporting accuracy without blocking settlement validation where allocation already works.
Which decision best supports the constraint?
Response:
A) Validate and correct the cost distribution setup for the hazardous handling charge before releasing settlement postings for the affected lane.
B) Release settlement for the affected lane because freight order-level charge calculation already includes the hazardous handling amount.
C) Remove the hazardous handling charge from calculation and add it later during finance reconciliation for affected deliveries.
D) Block all carrier settlement validation until every accessorial charge type has been tested across all operating units.
Fragen und Antworten:
| 1. Frage Antwort: D | 2. Frage Antwort: B | 3. Frage Antwort: B | 4. Frage Antwort: A | 5. Frage Antwort: A |






1106 Kundenbewertungen

